Summary of Budget Presentation to Town Council and Finance Committee Discussion

3
school budget

Photo: istock

Amherst Schools Slated to Lose 22-23 Positions 

By Cathleen Michell

The following is a summary of the Town Manager’s budget presentation to the Amherst Town Council on May 5 and the Amherst Finance Committee’s discussion of the school budgets on May 8. Recording of the Town Council meeting here.

Elementary Schools

  • Town will provide a 4% increase over the FY25 budget amount ($28,049,236) plus a one-time gift of 1% in free cash ($269,704), for a total of a 5% increase over FY25.
  • This leaves the Elementary Schools with a $269,704 gap that they will need to close by eliminating 3-4 additional positions. We will not know more details about that until the Amherst (Elementary) School Committee meets again. 
  • By giving the money to the schools as a 4% increase and then the remainder from free cash, the town is assuming that expenses for the elementary schools will drop in FY27 when the new school opens. It remains to be seen whether the potential savings will erase a $269,704 gap, especially given the added expense of operating the 6th grade as an academy within the Amherst Regional Middle School building. 
  • Overall, for FY26, the elementary schools will cut $1,156,758 in spending and 10-11 positions. 

Regional Schools 

  • Town will provide a 4.81% increase over the FY25 budget amount ($19,744,008). 
  • Overall, for FY26, the regional schools will cut $812,126 in spending and 12.1 positions.
  • Leverett Town meeting approved the regional budget assessment. Pelham will vote on May 10 and Shutesbury will vote on May 31. Three out of four towns need to pass the budget.

Municipal Budget

  • In order to stay within the 4% budget guidelines, the Town Manager is freezing 6.4 positions. These are one in Finance, one in Police, one in Fire/EMS, two in CRESS, one in DPW-Highway, and 0.4 in Recreation. 
  • It is important to note that several of these positions (Police, Fire/EMS and CRESS) have historically been vacant. In particular, it is rare for the Police and Fire/EMS departments to be fully staffed due to challenges in hiring (as the Town Manager stated again on Monday), so in most recent years, salaries for these vacant positions were held in the budget anyway, and then just rolled into the surplus at the end of the year. So, in a sense, some of these “freezes” won’t actually equate to a reduction in Town services but instead in a reduction of the end of year surplus. 

Capital Improvement Plan

  • In order to provide for the additional funds for the regional schools, the percentage of tax revenue dedicated to capital has been reduced from 10.5% to 10.265% for FY26. This reduction is not coming out of any new capital spending but instead out of debt payments.
  • 84% of capital funds in FY26 are going to the municipal side of the budget. This is typical in terms of the municipal side getting the vast majority of the capital money and schools seeing very little. 
  • Many municipal departments have seen no increase or very minimal increases in their operating expensess over the last decade and instead seem to be receiving more and more in the way of capital funds to cover costs that might otherwise be included in their operating expenses. It is doubtful that the municipal side of the budget could stay within the prescribed 4% annual increase without these additional supplemental funds. Presenting the Capital Improvement Plan completely separately from the budget obscures how much additional money flows to the municipal departments every year. 
  • There does not seem to be any publicly available means of tracking where all of this capital money goes once it is approved and how it is ultimatley spent – more transparency is needed. 

A Note on Transparency

  • The Amherst Budget Book used to contain much more detail than it now does. 
  • Over the years, a lot of financial information has been removed and replaced with photos and lists of accomplishments.
  • The budget is missing details on grant funding, capital costs broken out by department, sources of funding for each department, and many other details that either used to be present or are routinely included in the Budget Book in other communities (Northampton has a very detailed Budget Book in comparison).
  • Transparency is important becuase as a community, we are being asked to accept that there simply isn’t enough money to sufficiently fund our schools, and yet we have very little transparency into how the money is actually being spent. 

Summary of the May 8 Finance Committee Meeting Focusing on the Schools’ Budgets

  • School Superintendent E. Xiomara Herman (Dr Xi) was sent a seven page list of questions in advance of this meeting. Many of them were well outside of the purvue of the Town Council and delved into district operations and programatic decisions. School Committee Member Jennifer Shiao was present and pushed back on the nature of many of the questions, as did Dr. Xi. Dr. Xi and her Finance Director, Shannon Bernacchia provided some of the answers that Finance Committee was seeking, while trying to stay focused on the questions that were actually within the purvue of the Town Council. 
  • Councilor Mandi Jo Hanneke (at large) claimed that the questions are within the purview of the Town Council because the proposed school budgets were higher than the guidelines provided by the Town Council. But Shiao reminded everyone that those are just guidelines and it is the duty of the School Committee to ensure that schools are meeting the needs of students. She urged Finance Committee to stay focused on the questions they needed answered in order to make a decision, and not just ask every question that they were curious about. Shiao urged the Town Council to trust the School Committee in the same way that they have recently stated that they trust the Library Trustees. 
  • Bernacchia and Dr. Xi reminded everyone that the school budget books are not final because the total amounts have been so fluid for so many months. All of the charts will not be updated until a final number is known, becasue it is too much work to update the entire document every time a new dollar amount is put out there. Many of the quetions Hanneke had were because she found what she thought were discrepencies but were explained by some sections of the budget book that had not yet been brought up to date. 
  • Dr. Xi had to repeatedly explain that the districts are obligated to serve all children who are enrolled, and that they can’t control who enrolls after the budget is made and thus there are often changes once the school year starts. 
  • Bernacchia confirmed  that there are costs that the regional schools are carrying themselves (like all IT/computers) for which the town receives supplemental funds.
  • . Recording of the Finance Committee meeting here

Spread the love

3 thoughts on “Summary of Budget Presentation to Town Council and Finance Committee Discussion

  1. So the Town Manager’s budget cuts 20+ people from the schools and no town staff. Is this correct?

  2. Janet – The Town Manager’s budget freezes 6.4 vacant positions in the town. His budget does not include funding for these positions and thus they will not be filled in the coming year. In the past, the salaries for some of these vacant positions were kept in the budget and when not filled, those salaries rolled into the surplus at the end of the year. At least that is my understanding of some of these harder to fill positions.

Leave a Reply

The Amherst Indy welcomes your comment on this article. Comments must be signed with your real, full name & contact information; and must be factual and civil. See the Indy comment policy for more information.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.