Letter: Proposed Parking Garage Looking Like A Back Room Deal

Aerial view of town parking lot behind CVS. Photo: Google Maps

The following letter was sent to the Amherst Town Council and the Planning Board on September 24, 2021

I noticed that the rezoning of the town lot behind CVS is on the Planning Board agenda for September 29. It has come to my attention that the Jones Library Trustees were told by George Ryan and BID head Gabrielle Gould at their September 20 meeting that plans for a three story parking garage were “quietly being drawn up” by Kuhn-Riddle with backing from Barry Roberts. This directly contradicts what the Planning Board was told by Ryan in July- that there was no definite plan, but that rezoning would permit a parking garage to be built if the town wanted it. 

This explains why Ryan was so resistant to studying any other locations for a parking garage—why he was so vague about how many spaces would actually be gained—why there was no mention of how much money the town would lose by giving up the current spaces. His only comment  at the Trustees meeting was that the plan was opposed by “the same three to five residents” of North Prospect Street and, at the July 7 Planning Board meeting,  that it would cost $300,000 to resurface the current lot. 

This is a shameful back room deal. It may be that the CVS lot is a good place for a parking garage, but it is unconscionable to plan it without proper study, and to present the rezoning as just a “preliminary step” when, in reality, a whole design is being developed. This is a similar process to what happened with the failed elementary school project and the current library expansion. Plans were drawn up and presented as take it or lose the money, even though the plans were flawed and hardly subject to public deliberation.  Contrast this process to the one Amherst Media went through to get their new building approved. Plans were presented to several committees and refined until the finished plan was much improved.

I would like to see some honesty from those trying to redefine Amherst.  Projects developed without public input inevitably  end up with serious flaws. The Planning Board and Town Council should not allow this project to move forward until it receives the proper study and thorough public vetting that it requires.

Maura Keene

Maura Keene is a frequent contributor to The Amherst Indy. She is an obstetrician-gynecologist at Bay State Health Systems. Her four children are graduates of the Amherst schools. She has lived in Amherst since 1982.

Spread the love

3 thoughts on “Letter: Proposed Parking Garage Looking Like A Back Room Deal

  1. Has anyone ever talked to the Bank of America about participating in a public private partnership over its South Prospect St. lot? The land abuts a town-owned lot too. Why are we restricting the RFP to the CVS lot? Because City of Tsrehma always does things a—backwards? Or is this the definition of “Open to the max”?

    Hilda Greenbaum

  2. Combine both Bank’s lots with the Municipal lot and build a multi-story garage, setting aside spaces for the Banks’ needs. That would be a better location for access and egress, for reaching movies, restaurants, businesses, and the library. And less impact on private homes.
    Why are we not examining that location? We know who will suffer from the CVS location; but, we don’t know who will benefit from the CVS location?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.