Letter: Vote No On Library To Start Over Smart

Jones Library. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Amherst will vote on November 2, as to whether or not to support $35.3 million in new borrowing for the expansion and renovation of the Jones Library.  Here I would like to address the library’s poorly thought-through rationales for expansion, addressing the three foundational arguments made in defense.  

▪  Library usage and available library resources.  I wonder how many folks in Amherst, or residents in the Commonwealth, realize all state residents have free use of the Massachusetts university and college libraries. We Amherst townsfolks may also use the Amherst College library.  The library needs assessment not only omits these rich resources but stretches their user count by including university and college students.  I have rarely seen these students in the Jones and why would they go with convenient access to such excellent resources on their campuses!  The library trustees have grossly biased their analysis by including college and university students as among the users while leaving out these students’ own resources.  

▪  Promoting ESL.  Speaking of untallied resources, school buildings are empty for a substantial portion of weekdays and weekends. ESL is a vital educational activity, one that deserves to be in the schools, available for all who need it, adults and children. Using school space would have the added benefit of demonstrating to all that education is a lifelong endeavor in developing ourselves. For ESL students who are also parents, moving ESL into the schools would foster a sense of what I hope is true: that schools’ job is to nurture and help all of us to grow. This would be an efficient use of space.  More, it would build community.

▪  Appropriate space for our teens. As for a teen center, I think a skateboard park more to the point. A quiet library space labelled ‘teen center’ seems exactly misguided and doomed to failure, particularly in the planned location in the Jones’ current fiction room where second floor staff can oversee teens down below from their offices. Developmentally, teens seek their peers’ company with tactful and minimal adult supervision; such socializing is a stepping stone to adult autonomy.  Teen socializing involves sound – conversation, music, motion.  If someone knows of successful ‘teen rooms’ in quiet libraries, please let me know.  For us here, we need to, at a minimum, include in the plan considerable quality sound proofing.  

▪  The financial context.  Amherst town has three other major new projects, at least one of which, schools with healthy air, configured to facilitate learning, is long overdue, desperately needed, is not a place to Opinion: In Response To Being Mischaracterized As “Anti-development”skimp.  Clearly, town residents should be surveyed to assess priorities among all four, not seriatim.

Let’s start over smart.

Debra Jacobson

Debra Jacobson is a resident of Amherst

Spread the love

2 thoughts on “Letter: Vote No On Library To Start Over Smart

  1. I grew up from a very early age in 1966 loving libraries from the Nordic styled A frame Riverdale, NY library (still standing). In fact, back then, one of my PS 81 friends was Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He beat me in tether ball every school day at lunch time . Or the sweet 3 room Avon By The Sea Library. To the Irvington, New York Town Hall library with its calming blue tiles donated by resident Louis Comfort Tiffany. And the elegant Victorian Seymour Library in Auburn NY with a reading room with fireplace. Straight out of a Hollywood sound set. And it should be mentioned that the Warner Library was built on the Tarrytown-North Tarrytown border in 1938 to encourage cross community neighborhood connections. Why not here? Imagine Hadley and Amherst building a library together….The Hadley Library cost town taxpayers $6 million (plus a $2 million state grant)? And our proposal is $35 million?
    $35M for a library is a staggering figure and I am not a tax averse resident at all. I love libraries but this price is hard to understand. This writer above opines that all pending capital projects deserve some unified analysis and budgeting. Amen. If one has to purchase 3 or 4 projects it might be best to budget/ plan for all in advance and not independently.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.