Letter: Here’s a Way to Support Rent Control in Massachusetts

5
rent control

Photo: Homes for All Massachusetts

As many of you know, Amherst continues to struggle with a lack of affordable housing in town. According to our recent Amherst Housing Production Plan, 58.5% of renters in Amherst are considered “cost-burdened,” paying more than 30% of their income on rent and utilities—with 39.2% severely cost-burdened, paying over 50%.

Our community has long sought solutions to this problem, and has identified rent control as one element of a multi-pronged solution to the problem of creating more affordable housing in town. There is currently a campaign being run by Homes for All Massachusetts– a statewide formation of grassroots housing justice groups working to halt displacement, increase community control of land, and win housing justice– to get rent control on the MA ballot this fall  through the ballot initiative process. 

Homes for All began its ballot initiative campaign due to a lack of action on the pending legislation S. 1447 and H.2328, “An Act Enabling Cities and Towns to Stabilize Rents and Protect Tenants,” which would reverse the 1994 ballot initiative that made rent control illegal in Massachusetts. Notably, Amherst voted against eliminating rent control by a large majority in 1994.

Please sign on to this Town Council resolution as a community sponsor so that we can communicate loud and clear to the MA legislature – we need action on this bill so that towns and cities can legally implement rent control measures through their local democratically elected representatives and bodies. It’s an important tool in the toolbox for communities to promote affordable housing, and we deserve to have access to it again in Amherst.

Please see the attached factsheet to learn more about the bill.


Proposed Amherst Town Council Resolution

Town of Amherst Resolution in support of S. 1447, and H.2328,  “An Act Enabling Cities and Towns to Stabilize Rents and Protect Tenants”

“An Act Enabling Cities and Towns to Stabilize Rents and Protect Tenants” 

 Council Sponsors: Councilors Brevik, Cano-Martin, and Walker 

WHEREAS, the rapidly escalating cost of housing in Amherst has created profound instability for renters—placing many seniors, workers, students, and families at risk of displacement and housing insecurity; and 

WHEREAS, nearly a third of non-student residents surveyed during the Amherst Housing Production Plan development, including 25% of families, anticipate leaving Amherst within five years, with most citing housing costs as the main reason; and  

WHEREAS, despite creating an inclusionary zoning bylaw, which has resulted in an increase in affordable housing units, housing in Amherst remains unattainable for many; and 

WHEREAS, Amherst has 11.86% of its housing stock listed on the Subsidized Housing Inventory, though less than 7% is truly affordable with income restrictions; and 

WHEREAS, Amherst’s rental prices are high, ranging from 50 to 100 percent above the regional Fair Market Rent with a one bedroom in Amherst averaging $1,752 a month versus $1,115 a month in the region; and 

WHEREAS, as reported in the Amherst Housing Production Plan, in 2023, 28% of Amherst households earned less than $30,000 a year, and 40.8% of low-income households had incomes under 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level; and  

 WHEREAS, residents across Amherst consistently cite housing affordability as a top concern, and according to the Amherst Housing Production Plan, 58.5% of renters in Amherst are considered “cost-burdened,” paying more than 30% of their income on rent and utilities—with 39.2% severely cost burdened, paying over 50%; and 

 WHEREAS, due to the competitive rental market, investors buy residential properties in Amherst in the hopes of profiting from the high demand, often pricing out potential homebuyers; and 

WHEREAS, during the Amherst Community Voices on Affordable Housing listening session, community members stated that a multiprong strategy must be employed to build and maintain housing affordability, with rent control being one tool alongside strategic development; and 

 WHEREAS, while rent control was banned through a 1994 statewide ballot question, Amherst voters supported the continuation of rent control by a significant margin; and  

 WHEREAS, rent control was a popular theme for further exploration to help address housing instability and displacement at the Amherst Community Voices on Affordable Housing listening session in June, 2023; and 

 WHEREAS, Mayor Michelle Wu and the Boston City Council voted on a home rule petition in 2022 to stabilize rents in Boston that was filed with the Massachusetts legislature and then sent to committee to study; and 

 WHEREAS, because the current Massachusetts statute prohibits rent control, Amherst cannot address this problem without legislative action on the state level. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Amherst Town Council supports Bill H.2328 and S.1447, “An Act enabling cities and towns to stabilize rents and protect tenants,” calling for the repeal of statewide rent control preemptions, allowing cities and towns to institute rent stabilization measures and implement tenant protections with exemptions for owner-occupied buildings of four or fewer units and for newly constructed buildings. 

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Clerk of the Council shall cause this resolution to be sent to Governor Maura Healey, Attorney General Andrea Campbell, State Senator Jo Comerford, State Representative Mindy Domb, and Mayor of Boston Michelle Wu. 

Spread the love

5 thoughts on “Letter: Here’s a Way to Support Rent Control in Massachusetts

  1. What no one on either side of the aisle wants to talk about is how proposition 13, passed in California circa 1978, is causing serious problems in the state today.

    Unlike Massachusetts proposition 2 1/2, what proposition 13 did was say that the taxes that the current property owner is paying cannot be increased, but the property could be taxed higher at the inflated market rate when it was sold to someone else. What this essentially did was enabled the baby boomers to live in their homes, but made it impossible for younger families to live in California and they increasingly moved to other states. California, thus wound up with a very rich and the very poor, but few in between.

    I have yet to see a rent control proposal that won’t do the exact same thing — help those who already have an apartment at the expense of those who don’t. I’d like to see it done, but I’ve yet to see if proposed that could actually benefit all tenants.

    The challenge to rent control advocates is to explain how rent control won’t prevent the construction of new housing and the investment of rehab money into existing but deteriorated housing. Again, I’d like to see that done, but…..

  2. I have learned from many in the rental business that there is a very high level of vacancies of the higher end apartments in Amherst .
    The market will have its own form of rent control.
    No need to support this effort .

  3. In addition: rent control will only impact renewing leases (from what I have read) and are limited by the Cost of Living which currently is 2.9%. However, the increasing costs of leasing units in Amherst is considerably higher than 2.9% due to our high tax rate, high utility rates, the expense to bring our older affordable housing stock up to current codes plus the registration and inspection fees etc. Rents can be raised to market level when leases turn over. So we end up with a two-tier system due to many student rentals turning over annually.

    I’ve sold all my “paid up” apartment units and rents were raised substantially by the new owners. Despite the market volatility, Vanguard 500 ETF and QQQ are much less stressful than owning Amherst rental property. And the proceeds bought a nice new library for North Amherst. This town has lost its way!😖

  4. The proposed ballot question does not take into account vacancies or renovations. So even when a tenant moves out, rent cannot go to market levels no matter what. This is one of the biggest issues with this ballot question.

    I urge town government and rent control supporters to read this:
    https://masslandlords.net/policy/rent-control/
    It explains the history, why it didn’t work and the harm it will cause. What is being currently proposed is even worse. Say goodbye to small landlords. Rent control will not affect new construction. Older homes will deteriorate, be bought out by big companies, be rebuilt to avoid rent control. If you search some apartment complexes, they have price options for renovated or not renovated. That WILL end because those landlords will have no incentive to renovate since they can’t recover some of their costs. Property taxes, insurance, maintenance , legal costs all go up higher than the allowable increase. There are better options. Even basing rent increases on profit would be less draconian.

  5. This has always been a problem for young people starting out on their own. In the 1970’s, in Boston/ Cambridge area, we saw the same thing: one bedrooms were too expensive of one person, and studios were just barely affordable. Faced with this situation, what did thousands of young people do? We shared houses or large apartments and split the rent, utilities and food equally. It was easy to find places to share through local publications like the Phoenix and The Real Paper. What is keeping people from doing that today? Rents will always be out of sync with a young person’s income. And you had money left over to enjoy your life a bit more! Try it.

Leave a Reply

The Amherst Indy welcomes your comment on this article. Comments must be signed with your real, full name & contact information; and must be factual and civil. See the Indy comment policy for more information.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.